Prove hiring ROI before a full rollout.
BetterMock ROI starts with one active role. Measure how much manual screening time is removed, how quickly candidates reach a shortlist, and whether the pilot produces enough savings and evidence to justify rollout.
Pilot ROI model
Use one role to measure recruiter time saved, interview cycle speed, net savings, and time-to-shortlist impact before expanding.
One-role pilot model
Baseline the current process, run the pilot, then compare hours saved and shortlist speed.
Formula: candidates x minutes saved per screen / 60 x recruiter hourly cost, minus pilot fee.
Measure BetterMock with the numbers hiring leaders already care about.
Estimate savings from candidates screened, current review minutes, BetterMock review minutes, and recruiter hourly cost
Show the impact of AI-led first rounds on interview cycle speed and time-to-shortlist
End the pilot with shortlist evidence, review history, hours saved, and estimated net savings after pilot fee
How BetterMock is evaluated
Teams know screening takes time, but rarely calculate the cost of every manual first pass.
Example: 250 candidates x 15 minutes saved per screen = 62.5 recruiter hours saved.
Tool cost is reviewed separately from recruiter effort, making ROI hard to explain.
At Rs 2,500 per recruiter hour, 62.5 hours saved is Rs 156,250 gross savings. After a Rs 75,000 pilot fee, estimated net savings is Rs 81,250.
First-round interviews wait on recruiter or interviewer availability, slowing shortlists.
AI-led structured rounds can run faster while human reviewers focus on evidence, exceptions, and final decisions.
Leadership sees activity reports but not a clean link between process change and hiring impact.
BetterMock reports candidate movement, scorecards, review history, recruiter hours saved, and time-to-shortlist impact.
Set the baseline: candidate volume, manual screening minutes, recruiter hourly cost, and current time-to-shortlist
Run one active role through BetterMock with structured intake, screening, interviews, and scorecards
Compare BetterMock review effort against the old process
Subtract the pilot fee and report net savings, hours saved, and shortlist speed
Recruiter hours saved from reduced manual screening
Estimated gross and net savings after pilot cost
Faster first-round interview cycles through AI-assisted interviews
Decision-ready shortlist with evidence and review trail
Why BetterMock
Most hiring stacks are assembled from an ATS, scheduling tools, interview rooms, spreadsheets, notes, and manual follow-ups. BetterMock is built as a role-led hiring workspace where sourcing, screening, AI or human interviews, scorecards, approvals, stream movement, and pilot ROI live together.
BetterMock is not just software your team has to figure out alone. We help onboard the workspace, configure the first role, calibrate the rubric, support the pilot, review money saved, and plan the next rollout only after the value is clear.